linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce HIGH_ORDER delineating easily reclaimable orders

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070421013210.1bed9ceb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:32:10 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce HIGH_ORDER delineating easily reclaimable
 orders

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the inactive
> list".

Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping all the lumpy patches
together into one lump.

I was going to duck patches #2 and #3, such was my outrage.  But given that
it's all lined up to be a single patch, followup cleanup patches will fit in
OK.  Please.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/