| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <462C8922.7070401@shadowen.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:23:30 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce HIGH_ORDER delineating easily reclaimable orders Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > >> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then >> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the inactive >> list". > > Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping all the lumpy patches > together into one lump. > > I was going to duck patches #2 and #3, such was my outrage. But given that > it's all lined up to be a single patch, followup cleanup patches will fit in > OK. Please. Yes. Its funny how you can get so close to a change that you can no longer see the obvious warts on it. I am actually travelling today, so it'll be tommorrow now. But I'll roll the cleanups and get them to you. I can also offer you a clean drop in lumpy stack with the HIGH_ORDER change pulled out to the top once you are happy. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists