[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070421093723.GA2090@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:37:23 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, vatsa@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH(experimental) 2/2] Fix freezer-kthread_stop race
Hi!
> > Of course, running try_to_freeze() in kthread_stop() would be very wrong,
> > so we'd actually need to do it in callers, preferably via a new
> > kthread_stop_freezeable() wrapper.
> >
> Well, even then we'll need to ensure that a thread would not call
> kthread_stop_freezeable() with any locks held. That would mean more
> audits :)
I'll take audits over 200 new lines of code ;-). (And it should be
reasonably simple to audit; person doing kthread_stop() ->
ktrhread_stop_freezeable() should look after locks).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists