linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/3] Separate freezer flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704222128.49419.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:28:48 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, ego@...ibm.com,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vatsa@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ibm.com, pavel@....cz
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/3] Separate freezer flags

Hi,

The following three patches are related to the separation of the freezer flags
from process/threadinfo flags.

The first patch separates the freezer from the PM code, because it's no longer
a PM-specific piece of code.  This also makes the second patch look better.

The second patch introduces the freezer_flags field of task_struct, present
only if the freezer is compiled in.  All of the freezer-related flags per-task
flags are moved to this field and auxiliary functions for operating them are
defined in freezer.h .  This overlaps with the Gautham's work to some extent,
but I think it's better to introduce these changes independently of the CPU
hotplug code.

The third patch is a bonus. ;-)

Greetings,
Rafael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/