[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704222345500.5442@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> Another option might be to name each cache actually created with a
> unique name, and then create a symlink for each cache that was asked
> for (whether it was created or whether a pre-existing cache was used).
> Then being lazy about deletion shouldn't be a problem.
You may be right.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists