[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070425002208.732d4bda@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:22:08 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ashok.raj@...el.com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel IOMMU][patch 8/8] Preserve some Virtual Address when
devices cannot address entire range.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:38:35 -0700
>
> > Its not clear if we have a very generic device breakage.. most devices
> > on these platforms are going to be more recent, (except maybe some
> > legacy fd)...
>
> I'm not so sure, there are some "modern" sound cards that have
> a 31-bit DMA addressing limitation because they use the 31st
> bit as a status bit in their DMA descriptors :-)
The sound stuff is going away bit by bit thankfully, but the 30bit DMA
limit is present on some more demented wireless chips still.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists