[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462EAB13.4040104@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:12:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, gregkh@...e.de,
muli@...ibm.com, asit.k.mallick@...el.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel IOMMU][patch 8/8] Preserve some Virtual Address when devices
cannot address entire range.
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 23:50:26 David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:38:35 -0700
>>
>>> Its not clear if we have a very generic device breakage.. most devices
>>> on these platforms are going to be more recent, (except maybe some
>>> legacy fd)...
>> I'm not so sure, there are some "modern" sound cards that have
>> a 31-bit DMA addressing limitation because they use the 31st
>> bit as a status bit in their DMA descriptors :-)
>
> There's also a 2GB only megaraid RAID controller that's pretty popular
> because Dell shipped it for a long time.
>
You can probably find almost any possible bitmask if you look long
enough. Hardware vendors are notorious for this kind of "optimizations".
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists