linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix chapter reference in CodingStyle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070425083506.2a58c512.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:35:06 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix chapter reference in CodingStyle

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:10:22 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> commit 226a6b84aaaf1fac7a5d41cf4e7387fd9ba895d5 renumbered Chapter 11 in 
> Documentation/CodingStyle to Chapter 12, but it didn't update the reference 
> to that chapter further down in the file. This patch corrects the chapter 
> reference.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>

> --- 
> 
>  Documentation/CodingStyle |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> index 9069189..899777f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ language.
>  
>  There appears to be a common misperception that gcc has a magic "make me
>  faster" speedup option called "inline". While the use of inlines can be
> -appropriate (for example as a means of replacing macros, see Chapter 11), it
> +appropriate (for example as a means of replacing macros, see Chapter 12), it
>  very often is not. Abundant use of the inline keyword leads to a much bigger
>  kernel, which in turn slows the system as a whole down, due to a bigger
>  icache footprint for the CPU and simply because there is less memory
> 


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/