linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: update cpu after new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:49:36 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: update cpu after new_slab()

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > SLUB gave me a NULL pointer dereference in slab_alloc(), in the
> > slab_lock(page) of its "Current cpuslab is acceptable" block: cpu
> > 1 had been looking at cpu_slab[2], which then went NULL beneath it.
> > Since new_slab() may reenable interrupts and sleep (when __GFP_WAIT),
> > we may get rescheduled on a different cpu: so need to reevaluate it.
> 
> Right. local_irq_save does not switch off preemption as I thought.

Strange comment.  Preemption is not possible while IRQs are disabled,
but new_slab() rightly reenables them within itself in the __GFP_WAIT
case, since it's going off to do a page allocation and may need to wait.

(And actually, this kernel was a CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y one.)

> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>

Thanks,
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/