linux-kernel - Re: Back to the future.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:28:07 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	nigel@...el.suspend2.net
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Back to the future.

On 4/26/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net> wrote:
> 3) Someone else steps up to the plate and tries to merge Suspend2 one
> bit at a time.

So which bits do we want to merge? For example, Suspend2
kernel/power/ui.c, kernel/power/compression.c, and
kernel/power/encryption.c seem pointless now that we have uswsusp.
Furthermore, being the shameless Linus cheerleader that I am, I got
the impression that we should fix the snapshot/shutdown logic in the
kernel which Suspend2 doesn't really address?

                                Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/