| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:33:36 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) Hi! > > Yes, probably will. The other option is to break existing 32-bit > > userspace, which is a bit more common AFAICT. > > Judging from experience with the wext 32/64 bit fiasco it seems to be > rather uncommon to use 32-bit userspace on 64-bit machines. Well, it would break 32-bit userspace on 32-bit kernel, which is the most common version, AFAICT. > Rafael hinted that we could just add these numbers, keep the existing > ones and then phase them out over time, but I haven't really given it > much thought. We could probably do that... but it is slightly ugly. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists