[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070426113525.GA1332@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:35:26 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:17:12PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 23:24 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > I believe uswsusp user/kernel separation is clean enough. Kernel
> > provides "snapshot image" and "resume image". (Thanks go to Rafael for
> > very clean interface).
>
> The interface isn't even 64/32-bit compatible...
It's not . And it's one of the worst interface I've seen lately.
Did anyone actually review this crap before it went in? I completely
agree with Linus that these kind of boundaries that lead to horribly
complex ioctl interface are totally wrong.
Now suspend2 wasn't exactly nice either when I last reviewed it,
but we should probably give it another attempt if we can sort out
a proper incremental merge.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists