| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:35:26 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:17:12PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 23:24 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I believe uswsusp user/kernel separation is clean enough. Kernel > > provides "snapshot image" and "resume image". (Thanks go to Rafael for > > very clean interface). > > The interface isn't even 64/32-bit compatible... It's not . And it's one of the worst interface I've seen lately. Did anyone actually review this crap before it went in? I completely agree with Linus that these kind of boundaries that lead to horribly complex ioctl interface are totally wrong. Now suspend2 wasn't exactly nice either when I last reviewed it, but we should probably give it another attempt if we can sort out a proper incremental merge. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists