[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4630E9C8.5060000@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:04:56 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
IMO, the closer you look, the more warts you find. Before you starting
doing your work with kernel regressions, no one was really tracking it.
I bet you have helped cut down on the regressions, but I have no good
way to quantify my gut feeling.
Additional comments on developers and fixing regressions:
* Sometimes seeing a long list, peoples' eyes glaze over. Its just
human nature. A long list also gives us no idea of scale, or severity.
I bet a weekly "top 10 bugs and regressions" email would help focus
developer attention.
* To be effective, lists, either long or top-10, must be pruned if you
get a sense that only one user is affected. [With oopses and BUGs as a
clear exception,] many problems benefit from at least two users
reporting a bug.
* It gets a bit tiresome to field the large number of driver bug reports
that eventually turn out to be related to broken interrupt handling
somehow. I think we developers need to get better at showing users how
to isolate driver vs. PCI/ACPI/core bugs. Maybe drivers need to start
introducing interrupt delivery tests into their probe code. Overall,
broken interrupt handling manifests in several ways, most of which
initially appear symptomatic of a broken driver.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists