linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070426201325.8a1ebda3.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:13:25 +0200
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21

El Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:02:28 -0400, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> escribió:

> Problem is, not enough developers pay attention to the -stable
> series. Adrian, maybe you could shift your attention there and
> stop trying to track the bleeding edge?

>From my humble POV, it's a problem that all this discussion was generated
on what Adrian does or stop doing. Apparently, unless Adrian posts his
list of know regressions, most of the people doesn't look at the bugzilla
at all. Maybe it'd be useful to create a per-release bug tracker in the
bugzilla or collect them into one of the a kernel.org's wiki, to make easier
to follow the current state of all the "important" regressions. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/