[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4631D9CD.4050106@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:09:01 -0400
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
reiserfs-dev@...esys.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21 reiserfs -- cicular locking?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:09:03 +0200,
> I wrote:
>> I got a similar bug right now at the fresh boot of 2.6.21.
>>
>>
>> ReiserFS: sda2: found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal
>> ReiserFS: sda2: using ordered data mode
>> ReiserFS: sda2: journal params: device sda2, size 8192, journal first block 18, max trans len 1024, max batch 900, max commit age 30, max trans age 30
>> ReiserFS: sda2: checking transaction log (sda2)
>> ReiserFS: sda2: Using r5 hash to sort names
>> ReiserFS: sda2: Removing [3613 1354701 0x0 SD]..done
>> ReiserFS: sda2: There were 1 uncompleted unlinks/truncates. Completed
>>
>> =======================================================
>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 2.6.21-work #1
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> mktemp/1459 is trying to acquire lock:
>> (&REISERFS_I(inode)->xattr_sem){..--}, at: [<e08a5236>] reiserfs_cache_default_acl+0x2a/0x9c [reiserfs]
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c016d7dc>] open_namei+0xe2/0x5a2
>>
>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> The message disappears when I revert the patch:
>
> commit 9b7f375505f5611efb562065b57814b28a81abc3
> Author: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
> Date: Mon Apr 23 14:41:17 2007 -0700
>
> reiserfs: fix xattr root locking/refcount bug
>
>
> So, likely a newly introduced bug after rc7...
I got a message with a trace similar to this from Vladimir before I
submitted that patch. I'm not sure how to annotate this, since the
xattr_sem can never be taken in the manner described. Internal inodes
are protected by I_PRIVATE.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGMdnNLPWxlyuTD7IRApM+AJwKynnSbQfGKByzvDFs5d0OqO82ggCfVzoP
MNzGHMUQdmn2Xg31QWhB3mQ=
=A37l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists