[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177678002.6024.11.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:46:42 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 14:40 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Five callbacks are fine by me, especially if we can define reasonable defaults
> > for the hibernation (and can we?).
>
> Well, we still can default to suspend(PMSG_FREEZE) for freeze(), and
> resume() for thaw(). Anything else is just not sane way forward.
I think we should remove the argument to suspend() in the same patch
series. Yes, that would mean porting all drivers that currently use it,
but that's not actually all that many since most drivers are dumbed-down
wrt. power management.
And realistically, resume for thaw makes no sense, nor does suspend for
freeze, so we probably want to change those over to suspend/restart and
use them. or something.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists