[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070427125001.GI22250@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:50:01 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)
Hi!
> > > Five callbacks are fine by me, especially if we can define reasonable defaults
> > > for the hibernation (and can we?).
> >
> > Well, we still can default to suspend(PMSG_FREEZE) for freeze(), and
> > resume() for thaw(). Anything else is just not sane way forward.
>
> I think we should remove the argument to suspend() in the same patch
> series. Yes, that would mean porting all drivers that currently use
> it,
Well, if you can do it in one patch series, go ahead. But I think such
massive change all over kernel will take slightly longer, so I'd
prefer to keep the dummy argument for a while (so it still compiles)
and fix it slowly.
Of course, it is up to the person doing the series. And yes, such
series would be welcome.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists