| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cc96a5040704261802v2bcb3a59k9d44da8d615a6779@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:02:52 -0700
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@...gle.com>
To: ak@....de, vojtech@...e.cz
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>
Background:
We've found that MCEs (specifically DRAM SBEs) tend to come in bunches,
especially when we are trying really hard to stress the system out. The
current MCE poller uses a static interval which does not care whether it
has or has not found MCEs recently.
Description:
This patch makes the MCE poller adjust the polling interval dynamically.
If we find an MCE, poll 2x faster (down to 10 ms). When we stop finding
MCEs, poll 2x slower (up to check_interval seconds). The check_interval
tunable becomes the max polling interval.
Result:
If you start to take a lot of correctable errors (not exceptions), you
log them faster and more accurately (less chance of overflowing the MCA
registers). If you don't take a lot of errors, you will see no change.
Alternatives:
I considered simply reducing the polling interval to 10 ms immediately
and keeping it there as long as we continue to find errors. This felt a
bit heavy handed, but does perform significantly better for the default
check_interval of 5 minutes (we're using a few seconds when testing for
DRAM errors).
Patch:
This patch is against 2.6.21-rc7.
Signed-Off-By: Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>o
---
diff -pruN linux-2.6.20/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
--- linux-2.6.20/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2007-04-24 23:36:04.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2007-04-26 10:40:29.000000000 -0700
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ void mce_log_therm_throt_event(unsigned
*/
static int check_interval = 5 * 60; /* 5 minutes */
+static int next_interval; /* in jiffies */
static void mcheck_timer(struct work_struct *work);
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(mcheck_work, mcheck_timer);
@@ -339,7 +340,6 @@ static void mcheck_check_cpu(void *info)
static void mcheck_timer(struct work_struct *work)
{
on_each_cpu(mcheck_check_cpu, NULL, 1, 1);
- schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, check_interval * HZ);
/*
* It's ok to read stale data here for notify_user and
@@ -349,17 +349,24 @@ static void mcheck_timer(struct work_str
* writes.
*/
if (notify_user && console_logged) {
+ /* if we logged an MCE, reduce the polling interval */
+ next_interval = max(next_interval/2, HZ/100);
notify_user = 0;
clear_bit(0, &console_logged);
printk(KERN_INFO "Machine check events logged\n");
+ } else {
+ next_interval = min(next_interval*2, check_interval*HZ);
}
+
+ schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, next_interval);
}
static __init int periodic_mcheck_init(void)
{
- if (check_interval)
- schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, check_interval*HZ);
+ next_interval = check_interval * HZ;
+ if (next_interval)
+ schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, next_interval);
return 0;
}
__initcall(periodic_mcheck_init);
@@ -597,12 +604,13 @@ static int mce_resume(struct sys_device
/* Reinit MCEs after user configuration changes */
static void mce_restart(void)
{
- if (check_interval)
+ if (next_interval)
cancel_delayed_work(&mcheck_work);
/* Timer race is harmless here */
on_each_cpu(mce_init, NULL, 1, 1);
- if (check_interval)
- schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, check_interval*HZ);
+ next_interval = check_interval * HZ;
+ if (next_interval)
+ schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, next_interval);
}
static struct sysdev_class mce_sysclass = {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists