| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070427010253.GV6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:02:53 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@...com>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
* Peter Keilty (peter.keilty@...com) wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 6077300..35ad71f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -480,10 +480,12 @@ #endif
> /* Get end time (ticks) */
> t2 = inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_IA64
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
> /* TSC halts in C2, so notify users */
> mark_tsc_unstable();
> #endif
> +#endif
Is this a better description of the dependency?
#if defined (CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME) && defined (CONFIG_X86_TSC)
> /* Re-enable interrupts */
> local_irq_enable();
> current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
> @@ -522,10 +524,12 @@ #endif
> acpi_set_register(ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE, 0);
> }
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_IA64
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
> /* TSC halts in C3, so notify users */
> mark_tsc_unstable();
> #endif
> +#endif
ditto
> /* Re-enable interrupts */
> local_irq_enable();
> current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hpet.c b/drivers/char/hpet.c
> index 0be700f..5ea7d3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hpet.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hpet.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/bcd.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -51,8 +52,34 @@ #define HPET_DRIFT (500)
>
> #define HPET_RANGE_SIZE 1024 /* from HPET spec */
>
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> +#define write_counter(V, MC) writeq(V, MC)
> +#define read_counter(MC) readq(MC)
> +#else
> +#define write_counter(V, MC) writel(V, MC)
> +#define read_counter(MC) readl(MC)
> +#endif
> +
> static u32 hpet_nhpet, hpet_max_freq = HPET_USER_FREQ;
>
> +static void __iomem *hpet_mc_ptr;
CodingStyle nit: we don't need all this _ptr...
> +static cycle_t read_hpet(void)
> +{
> + return (cycle_t)read_counter((void __iomem *)hpet_mc_ptr);
> +}
> +
> +static struct clocksource clocksource_hpet = {
> + .name = "hpet",
> + .rating = 300,
> + .read = read_hpet,
> + .mask = 0xffffffffffffffffLL,
> + .mult = 0, /*to be caluclated*/
> + .shift = 10,
> + .is_continuous = 1,
> +};
> +static struct clocksource *hpet_clocksource_p;
and _p naming.
> +
> /* A lock for concurrent access by app and isr hpet activity. */
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hpet_lock);
> /* A lock for concurrent intermodule access to hpet and isr hpet activity. */
> @@ -79,7 +106,7 @@ struct hpets {
> struct hpets *hp_next;
> struct hpet __iomem *hp_hpet;
> unsigned long hp_hpet_phys;
> - struct time_interpolator *hp_interpolator;
> + struct clocksource *hp_clocksource;
> unsigned long long hp_tick_freq;
> unsigned long hp_delta;
> unsigned int hp_ntimer;
> @@ -94,13 +121,6 @@ #define HPET_IE 0x0002 /* interrupt en
> #define HPET_PERIODIC 0x0004
> #define HPET_SHARED_IRQ 0x0008
>
> -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> -#define write_counter(V, MC) writeq(V, MC)
> -#define read_counter(MC) readq(MC)
> -#else
> -#define write_counter(V, MC) writel(V, MC)
> -#define read_counter(MC) readl(MC)
> -#endif
>
> #ifndef readq
> static inline unsigned long long readq(void __iomem *addr)
> @@ -737,27 +757,6 @@ static ctl_table dev_root[] = {
>
> static struct ctl_table_header *sysctl_header;
>
> -static void hpet_register_interpolator(struct hpets *hpetp)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TIME_INTERPOLATION
> - struct time_interpolator *ti;
> -
> - ti = kzalloc(sizeof(*ti), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!ti)
> - return;
> -
> - ti->source = TIME_SOURCE_MMIO64;
> - ti->shift = 10;
> - ti->addr = &hpetp->hp_hpet->hpet_mc;
> - ti->frequency = hpetp->hp_tick_freq;
> - ti->drift = HPET_DRIFT;
> - ti->mask = -1;
> -
> - hpetp->hp_interpolator = ti;
> - register_time_interpolator(ti);
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Adjustment for when arming the timer with
> * initial conditions. That is, main counter
> @@ -909,7 +908,14 @@ int hpet_alloc(struct hpet_data *hdp)
> }
>
> hpetp->hp_delta = hpet_calibrate(hpetp);
> - hpet_register_interpolator(hpetp);
> +
> + if (!hpet_clocksource_p) {
> + clocksource_hpet.fsys_mmio_ptr = hpet_mc_ptr = &hpetp->hp_hpet->hpet_mc;
> + clocksource_hpet.mult = clocksource_hz2mult(hpetp->hp_tick_freq,
> + clocksource_hpet.shift);
> + clocksource_register(&clocksource_hpet);
> + hpet_clocksource_p = hpetp->hp_clocksource = &clocksource_hpet;
> + }
This looks like a change in behaviour for non-ia64. Now i386 and x86_64
will get this clocksource twice (and this one has a higher rating).
Doesn't look like this will even compile since fsys_mmio_ptr (more
extraneous _ptr suffix) is ia64 only? And sparc64 is left out in
the cold.
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -995,7 +1001,7 @@ static int hpet_acpi_add(struct acpi_dev
>
> static int hpet_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
> {
> - /* XXX need to unregister interpolator, dealloc mem, etc */
> + /* XXX need to unregister clocksource, dealloc mem, etc */
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> index daa4940..a20b4d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ struct clocksource {
> u32 shift;
> unsigned long flags;
> cycle_t (*vread)(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA64
> + void *fsys_mmio_ptr; /* used by fsyscall asm code */
> +#endif
>
> /* timekeeping specific data, ignore */
> cycle_t cycle_last, cycle_interval;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists