[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704270852480.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS
is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
>
> Could[/should] this stuff be changed from ratios to amounts? Or a quick
> boot-time test to use a ratio if the memory is small and an amount (like
> tax brackets, I would expect) if it's great?
Yes, the "percentage" thing was likely wrong. That said, there *is* some
correlation between "lots of memory" and "high-end machine", and that in
turn tends to correlate with "fast disk", so I don't think the percentage
approach is really *horribly* wrong.
The main issue with the percentage is that we do export them as such
through the /proc/ interface, and they are easy to change and understand.
So changing them to amounts is non-trivial if you also want to support the
old interfaces - and the advantage isn't obvious enough that it's a
clear-cut case.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists