[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463223C0.1080409@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:24:32 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when
FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
>> Could[/should] this stuff be changed from ratios to amounts? Or a quick
>> boot-time test to use a ratio if the memory is small and an amount (like
>> tax brackets, I would expect) if it's great?
>
> Yes, the "percentage" thing was likely wrong. That said, there *is* some
> correlation between "lots of memory" and "high-end machine", and that in
> turn tends to correlate with "fast disk", so I don't think the percentage
> approach is really *horribly* wrong.
>
> The main issue with the percentage is that we do export them as such
> through the /proc/ interface, and they are easy to change and understand.
> So changing them to amounts is non-trivial if you also want to support the
> old interfaces - and the advantage isn't obvious enough that it's a
> clear-cut case.
>
We could add a new "limit" field, though. If it defaulted to 0 (unlimited)
the default behavior wouldn't change.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists