lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:31:43 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:58:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > "no regressions" is definitely not feasible. > > 14 known regressions, some of them not yet debugged at all, are > different from your "some small regression". Yes, but when were some of these regressions reported? Past a certain point, I think it's reasonable to look at the regression, decide how many people would be affected by it, and why it hadn't been noticed earlier, and in some cases, decide that it's better to get this debugged and fixed in the stable and development trees in parallel. > And look e.g. at the many (and non-trivial) changes between -rc7 and > -final, resulting in more than one report from people who were running > -rc7 without problems - and 2.6.21 doesn't work for them. I agree that's unfortunate. > It's not a choice between "regressions don't matter" and "no regressions", > it's about the place in the area between these two extremes. I have my > opinions on what I want to expect from a stable Linux kernel, and other > people have different opinins. Everyone is going to disagree to some extent; and their own comfort zone. So a certain amount compromise is always going to be necessary. Of course, it's up to you decide whether this has gone beyond the zone where you aren't comfortable working with other people's development style. Regards, - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists