linux-kernel - Re: [patch] uml: fix cmpxchg warnings in -mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070427173511.GA9373@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:35:11 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch] uml: fix cmpxchg warnings in -mm

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:27:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Then atomic.h should include system.h and not rely on someone else doing it.
> Yes - then system.h may be included twice but that's ok.

I tried that - Andi didn't like it.  My current thinking is to pull the
cmpxchg stuff out of system.h into its own header since I don't see
any existing natural place to put it.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/