linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Introduce freezer flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070427220710.GC2994@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:07:10 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	ego@...ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Introduce freezer flags

Hi!

> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER
> > > > +	/* Used by the process freezer, defined in freezer.h */
> > > > +	unsigned int freezer_flags;
> > > 
> > > unsigned long freezer_flags; ??
> > 
> > I guess so.
> 
> Still, on x86_64, for example, we'll waste 4 bytes by using 'unsigned long'
> here, which I wouldn't like to do.
> 
> Is it acceptable to use explicit type casting in set_bit() and friends?

I'm afraid set_bit & friends are only defined on unsigned long. You
can cast, but you may run into some nasty surprise... like damaging
surrounding bytes on 64-bit architectures != x86_64.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/