[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46338DF8.8010901@m3y3r.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:10:00 +0200
From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
stable@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas.mey@....de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)
Thomas Gleixner schrieb:
> On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> Subject : Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok?
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307
>> Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas.mey@....de>
>> Status : Unknow
>>
>
> Michal,
>
> I don't think this is a regression. What Thomas wanted to point out is,
> that the amarok / sound device is making the positive effect of dynticks
> moot, as it starts to trigger useless interrupts.
>
> Thomas, is my interpretation correct ? Did you check, which interrupt
> was increasing - i.e. was it the soundcard one ?
>
No, it wasn't the soundcard one. but i had this effect with amarok and
audacious... so, i guessed... which was wrong.
It's the timer interrupt (+50-70 timer interrupts). But i'm not sure
what both applications are doing, while they are "idle"...
with kind regards
thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists