[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177792297.7646.297.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:31:37 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] UIO patches for 2.6.21
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 21:15 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I have a political question, if I have a user space driver, is my kernel
> > > tainted or not?
> >
> > Surely not. By using the kernel's userspace interface, you create no
> > "derived work" of the kernel. See COPYING in the root directory of the
> > kernel sources for details.
>
> That only covers normal system calls - but I don't think thats what is
> relevant, taints are for debug assistance not politics.
>
> I think we should have a taint flag for UIO type drivers. Not for any
> licensing or political reason but for the simple fact it means that there
> may be other complexities to debugging - and not the same one as a binary
> module. Probably we want the same marker for mmap /dev/mem too.
I agree, if we make it entirely clear that the flag is nonpolitical.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists