[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070428054800.GA6267@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:48:00 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Bryan WU <bryan.wu@...log.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > >
> > > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> > > long term support kernel instead to use the latest one.
> >
> > Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
> > releases :)
> >
>
> Yeah, but we are the vendor as you mentioned. -:))
Ah, then you already know what to do :)
> If we wanna to release a kernel to customer product development, how to
> choose the stable version?
That's up to you.
> Currently, we always followed the kernel release cycle/rules and give
> customer the latest stable version.
Ok, then what has really changed here? We've been doing this .y release
thing (also called -stable) for about 2 years now, nothing is different
this week from last.
Confused,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists