linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070429220011.GV3468@stusta.de>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:00:11 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 April 2007 22:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:18:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >...
> > > But emailed reports _are_ saved anyway and we _know_ how to get a copy.
> > > From lkml.org, for example.  Why don't we use that?  The only missing piece
> > > is the 'keep a list' thing, but that's not a rocket science, IMHO.
> > > 
> > > [For example, you can create a bugzilla entry with a link to the lkml.org copy
> > > of the relevant message, so why to require the reporter to file the report with
> > > the bugzilla himself?]
> > > 
> > > _Moreover_, some LKML archives, for example at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel,
> > > keep track of each thread separately, so you can browse any of them at any
> > > time.  In particular, you can see the _history_ of each bug report sent to LKML
> > > if you have a link to any message in its thread.
> > > 
> > > Really, if we ask reporters to put '[BUG]' in the subjects of their messages,
> > > you'll even be able to use the lkml.org archives plus wget and a couple of
> > > shell scripts to cherry pick the links to all bug reports sent to the list
> > > within a given time interval.
> > > 
> > > All of this functionality is out there already.
> > >...
> > 
> > How can I get the functionality "show me all unfixed SATA bugs"?
> > 
> > That's one of the important functionalities of every bug tracking 
> > system.
> 
> That's the missing piece, obviously.
> 
> BTW, I didn't want to say that one could entirely replace a bug-tracking system
> with tracking the LKML archives.  What I wanted to say was that the email
> messages sent to the LKML were easily trackable and could be hooked up into a
> bug-tracking system, for example with the help of URLs.
> 
> In such a setup people could send initial reports to the LKML and the links to
> these messages might be put into a bug-tracking system as soon as it turned
> out that the bugs were worthy of tracking.

Who is doing this "might be put", and why don't you start with asking 
the submitter to submit bugs in a bug tracking system and forward the 
bug report from the bug tracking system (manually or automatically) to 
the developers and linux-kernel?

> Greetings,
> Rafael

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/