[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46366B34.3050003@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:18:28 +0100
From: Matt Keenan <tank.en.mate@...il.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bradley Chapman <kakadu@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G and 1GB RAM
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:26:42 +0100 "Bradley Chapman" <kakadu@...il.com> wrote:
>
>>> Basically, all I want to know is whether or not enabling
>>> CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G for a laptop that has exactly 1GB of RAM will result
>>> in any performance degradation.
>>>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:17:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> I would expect the advantages of the additional 128MB to considerably
>> outweigh the cost of turning on CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G.
>> That cost will be a little extra CPU consumption inside the kernel, but the
>> great majority of CPU consumption usually happens in userspace anyway.
>>
>
> The CONFIG_VMSPLIT config options were merged for such cases.
>
> It should be able to split on any 4MB-aligned boundary in
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT appears to do something of
> this sort to use an entire 1GB RAM with minimal user address space
> reduction.
>
> This is an ELF ABI violation but the number of major applications
> that break is apparently low.
>
>
wine and some java implementations being two of the big caveats.
Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists