| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070430074044.GB19966@holomorphy.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:40:44 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Bradley Chapman <kakadu@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G and 1GB RAM On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:26:42 +0100 "Bradley Chapman" <kakadu@...il.com> wrote: >> Basically, all I want to know is whether or not enabling >> CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G for a laptop that has exactly 1GB of RAM will result >> in any performance degradation. On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:17:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I would expect the advantages of the additional 128MB to considerably > outweigh the cost of turning on CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. > That cost will be a little extra CPU consumption inside the kernel, but the > great majority of CPU consumption usually happens in userspace anyway. The CONFIG_VMSPLIT config options were merged for such cases. It should be able to split on any 4MB-aligned boundary in CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT appears to do something of this sort to use an entire 1GB RAM with minimal user address space reduction. This is an ELF ABI violation but the number of major applications that break is apparently low. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists