[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070501051155.GS19966@holomorphy.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, patches@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the 2G/2G split.
William Lee Irwin III a ?crit :
>> There's some sort of insanity going on here. Since when is 0x78000000
>> a 2GB/2GB split? Mark, dare I ask what you were thinking? That should
>> be VMSPLIT_2G_OPT for 2GB laptops analogously to VMSPLIT_3G_OPT, if
>> nothing else, as it's certainly not 2GB/2GB.
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:57:19AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Please could you stop saying others are insane ?
> They are like you and can fail sometime. Apparently when the patch came,
> nobody (including you) commented.
> It's not that difficult to think about VMALLOC space (I might be wrong
> about this, but I feel this explains 78000000 vs 80000000)
I'm obviously aware of vmallocspace. Read carefully:
>> a 2GB/2GB split? Mark, dare I ask what you were thinking? That should
>> be VMSPLIT_2G_OPT for 2GB laptops analogously to VMSPLIT_3G_OPT, if
>> nothing else, as it's certainly not 2GB/2GB.
The meaning of "for laptops" is that it's carving out a chunk of
user virtualspace to use for vmallocspace in lieu of carving out a
piece of the 1:1 mapping of physical memory for the same purpose.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists