[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705010918550.3808@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [AF_RXRPC]: Make the in-kernel AFS filesystem use AF_RXRPC.
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> This causes a compile failure on m68k:
>
> | linux/fs/afs/fsclient.c: In function 'afs_deliver_fs_fetch_data':
> | linux/fs/afs/fsclient.c:269: warning: dereferencing 'void *' pointer
> | linux/fs/afs/fsclient.c:269: error: request for member 'virtual' in something not a structure or union
>
> Probably you wanted to assign call->reply3 to a struct page pointer first, like you do for the call->unmarshall == 2 case.
Hmm. Wouldn't it be nicer to make "kmap_atomic()" be an inline function
instead? That way, if you pass it a "void *", it still just works, and you
get a much nicer/more readable error message too when the types actually
don't match?
Of course, there may be some reason why <linux/highmem.h> does those with
#define's rather than inline functions. Maybe "page_address()" or
"pagefault_disabled()" is not declared at that point, and asking it to be
declared might cause header file inclusion recursion?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists