[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705012217.14395.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:17:14 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To: ck@....kolivas.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ck] 2.6.21-ck1-rc1
Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Con Kolivas:
> > Let's call this a release candidate for 2.6.21-ck1. I've managed to
> > be well enough for enough time to bang this out.
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck1-rc1/
[...]
> Hello Con!
>
> Works nicely here. Did my usual stress testing... music playback is
> absolutely smooth.
>
> I will test it during the next 1-2 days at least.
>
> Got ridicolous long releasenames now ;-):
> 2.6.21.1-tp23-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio
> 2.6.21.1-tp42-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio
>
> Feels really very responsive. Those other patches seem to add to the
> responsiveness to sd-0.46 quite well. Can't really tell whether cfs-v7
> or cfs-v8-rc3 is really a slight bit smoother or not. Subjectively
[as I initially thought when comparind sd-0.46 without other ck patches
with cfs]
> seems to be pretty much the same now.
Hmmm, maybe thats the desktop tune patch which sets rr_interval for SD to
6 (from the default of 8) making the difference here.
Anyway its very difficult to tell a difference between ck1-rc1 and
CFS-v8-rc3 from subjective perception. I am really satisfied with both of
them.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists