[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24844.1178098371@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:51 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Not lining up with the code following the if statement is also
> a plus. Because it clearly delineates the conditions from the code.
But the condition doesn't line up with the code:
if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
smallcond2 &&
(conditionnumber3a ||
condition3b)) {
this_is_some_code();
this_is_some_more_code();
}
Personally, for complicated conditions like this, I prefer:
if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
smallcond2 &&
(conditionnumber3a ||
condition3b)
) {
this_is_some_code();
this_is_some_more_code();
}
But that seems to offend Andrew for some reason (or was it Christoph? or
both?).
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists