linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705021138.43297.ak@novell.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 11:38:43 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ell.com>
To:	Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the 2G/2G split.

On Tuesday 01 May 2007 19:00:46 Bill Irwin wrote:
> Bill Irwin a écrit :
> >> as a stopgap measure, but I'm not all that interested in grabbing patch
> >> credits where others could do it easily enough. Either of the config
> >> alterations is fine by me as they now stand; maybe Eric Dumazet might
> >> care to do something like my suggestion at some point.
> 
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:51:44PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Your patch is very fine Bill, please resubmit it with proper Signed-off-by
> > My first patch was a trivial reaction to try to keep alive 2G/2G split, 
> > yours is better for fine tuning.
> 
> I was hoping you would submit it as an update, but maybe adding your
> Signed-off-by: to my own will do.

Added thanks

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/