[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021233240.1543@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, haveblue@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> > I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been
> > dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it
> > will be much easier once the cleanups are in.
>
> And then there's patches such as kmemleak which would need to target
> all three. Plus it doesn't really make sense for users to select
> between three competiting implementations. Please don't take away our
> high hopes of getting rid of mm/slab.c Christoph =)
SLUB supports kmemleak (actually its quite improved). Switch debugging on
and try
cat /sys/slab/kmalloc-128/alloc_calls.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists