linux-kernel - Re: "partical" kthread conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070502123359.e82a668d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 12:33:59 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc:	Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "partical" kthread conversion

On Wed, 02 May 2007 08:45:54 -0600
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Dean Nelson <dcn@....com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:51:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> > There's probably a few more patches falling into this category, these
> >> > were just the first one the stick into my eye.
> >> 
> >> Yes, I think I'll probably drop all of them - I've completely lost track of
> >> which ones are complete, which ones need more work, etc.
> 
> Andrew as far as dropping them.  If all you have is one of my dinky patches
> that changes things to use kthread_run feel free, because of the general
> necessity of calling kthread_stop I'm going to have to rework those anyway,
> and I still have the originals.
> 

I gave up and dropped them all - let's have another run at it.  Possibly
some of them were complete and didn't deserve dropping, in which case you
can send them straight back at me.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/