linux-kernel - Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 23:03:10 +0400
From:	Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-dvb@...uxtv.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
 points about ...)

Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
> 
> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
> you may send an acked-by agreeing with the fix.
> 

Why don't you stop this childish behaviour ?

After explaining to you the reasons in the previous mail:
being the author and maintainer of dst/dst_ca and maintainer of
dvb-bt8xx, i NACK this change

(1) You aren't DVB maintainer
(2) one shouldn't make such judgement calls on somebody else's driver
unless it falls within your own maintainership


> Mauro.
> 
> Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 19:19 +0200, Markus Rechberger escreveu:
>> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Markus Rechberger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Manu,
>>>>
>>>> to me it looks like your  attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
>>>> several mails already which you just use to ignore.
>>> You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
>>> tend to flame people for nothing. I tend to ignore the flamers.
>>>
>> You should stop to rely on the history, since such a flame needs at
>> least 2 parties and back then you were also involved. There's nothing
>> else to say about that.
>>
>>>> If you don't change that attitude immediatelly I'd really wish to get
>>>> you banned of this community until you're open for discussions.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-dvb%40linuxtv.org/msg22943.html
>>>>
>>>> there's a bugreport and you fully ignore it, and you blame it on the
>>>> "politicians" here, telling me that there are mails out there
>>>> somewhere shows that you're not interested in getting forward.
>>>>
>>> That bug report very well proves my point.
>> Well it would be nice if you could answer the question in that mail
>> then, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't answer it.
>>
>> It's just a guess, but it seems like that you had a problem with other
>> developers at that part and it seems like it didn't get to an end
>> (probably because both parties didn't agree with each other)
>>
>> Markus
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/