lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705041340310.18504@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 13:42:09 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rewrite the MAJOR() macro as a call to imajor().


On May 4 2007 04:14, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On May 3 2007 23:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >>  	struct inode *i = file->f_mapping->host;
>> >>
>> >> -	return i && S_ISBLK(i->i_mode) && MAJOR(i->i_rdev) == LOOP_MAJOR;
>> >> +	return i && S_ISBLK(i->i_mode) && imajor(i) == LOOP_MAJOR;
>> >>  }
>> >
>> >there's no runtime change, and I count a couple hundred MAJORs in the tree.
>>
>> Why do we even have imajor() if all it does is calling the MAJOR()
>> macro?
>
>  i'm guessing it's to hide the underlying implementation of
>extracting the major/minor numbers from an inode, in case that
>implementation ever changes, which strikes me as perfectly reasonable.

How often has the implementation changed? I think i_rdev has been
there for a looong time. But yes, doing the MAJOR => imajor conversion
is preferable. Because you don't need the struct declaration for inode
then, and may omit to #include <linux/fs.h>. (Other things may need
fs.h so it's a bit of a corner case.)

>  all i was doing was standardizing the small handful of holdouts.

Please continue, this was not a rant :)



Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ