[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070506205320.GA6486@infomag.infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:53:20 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
Cc: "Curt E. Bruns" <curt.e.bruns@...el.com>,
Peter Milne <peter.milne@...acq.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.22 patch] iop: combined watchdog timer driver for iop3xx and iop13xx
Hi Dan,
> >Could you split this patch into 2 patches: one that deals with the moving
> >of
> >the architecture dependant code (and explaining why) and one with the new
> >watchdog drivers? I will continue my review today.
> >
>
> I am one of the maintainers of this architecture, (Lennert Buytenhek
> is the other). I will go ahead and split this up so you can sign-off
> on the watchdog specific bits. The intent is to move all hardware
> definitions under #include <asm/hardware.h>. You are right this
> should have been a separate patch.
I reviewed the rest of the code. Looks OK to me. One small remark though:
Can we change the ifdef's in the code as described in section 2 point 2 of
the Documentation/SubmittingPatches document?
Thanks,
Wim.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists