[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20705061547u7de21fas6ccad4258da57a9e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:47:32 -0700
From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
To: "Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: "Curt E. Bruns" <curt.e.bruns@...el.com>,
"Peter Milne" <peter.milne@...acq.com>,
"Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Lennert Buytenhek" <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.22 patch] iop: combined watchdog timer driver for iop3xx and iop13xx
On 5/6/07, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> > >Could you split this patch into 2 patches: one that deals with the moving
> > >of
> > >the architecture dependant code (and explaining why) and one with the new
> > >watchdog drivers? I will continue my review today.
> > >
> >
> > I am one of the maintainers of this architecture, (Lennert Buytenhek
> > is the other). I will go ahead and split this up so you can sign-off
> > on the watchdog specific bits. The intent is to move all hardware
> > definitions under #include <asm/hardware.h>. You are right this
> > should have been a separate patch.
>
> I reviewed the rest of the code. Looks OK to me. One small remark though:
> Can we change the ifdef's in the code as described in section 2 point 2 of
> the Documentation/SubmittingPatches document?
>
Ok, I can add this cleanup.
Barring any objections I'll go ahead and submit the revised patch with
an "Acked-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim at iguana dot be>" to Russell's
ARM patch tracker.
> Thanks,
> Wim.
>
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists