linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.6.21-uc0 (MMU-less updates)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070506114453.GB29643@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 6 May 2007 12:44:54 +0100
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.6.21-uc0 (MMU-less updates)

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:12:03PM -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > > Depending on how TASK_SIZE is defined - it looks like everyone else
> > > forces it to end of memory, except 68k[nommu].
> > >
> > > asm-arm/memory.h:#define TASK_SIZE              (CONFIG_DRAM_SIZE)
> >
> > That is one way to handle it. Have you followed all the other
> > uses of TASK_SIZE and verified it is not a problem?
> 
> No, I assumed that Russell/David were smarter than we were, and that doing so 
> would not be a problem :)

Don't look at me - the above came from Hyok, and I just assumed that it
was correct without really understanding it.

I've noticed though that Hyok's gone rather quiet, so I'm not sure
whether we'll ever get ARM uclinux integration complete.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/