linux-kernel - Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705061330120.13826@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Sun, 6 May 2007 13:33:29 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@...eria.pl>
cc:	Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@...il.com>,
	David Johnson <dj@...id-web.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up

On May 6 2007 12:25, Rafał Bilski wrote:

>> Nevermind, it does not look like it gets any cooler at lower frequencies,
>> so it's a nobrainer to run it at the default 733.
>
>Well. You have very good CPU - 4,4W typical and 6,0W is a factory maximum.

Says who? TM5800 draws around 2.0W (or even less) when idle [333 MHz]. :)
Though it has a different hardware engine than most x86.

>My is eating 6,78W while *sleeping* at 1GHz or about 5W while *sleeping* at 
>533MHz.
>> Jan
>Rafał
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Wicie, rozumicie....
>Zobacz >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a74
>

Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/