linux-kernel - Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <463DC809.5080400@interia.pl>
Date:	Sun, 06 May 2007 14:20:25 +0200
From:	Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@...eria.pl>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@...il.com>,
	David Johnson <dj@...id-web.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up

>> Well. You have very good CPU - 4,4W typical and 6,0W is a factory maximum.
> 
> Says who? TM5800 draws around 2.0W (or even less) when idle [333 MHz]. :)
> Though it has a different hardware engine than most x86.
Datasheet. It says that Your CPU needs 4,4W (typical) when 100% busy.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
NIE KUPUJ!!!
...zanim nie porownasz cen >> http://link.interia.pl/f1a5e



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/