[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a781481a0705070929q18525cbdp1e3b99705a7b18d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:59:28 +0530
From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
Cc: "Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gmail is a bit too popular..
On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <jakj@...-k-j.com> wrote:
> > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> > analysis I got following results:
> >
> > 2101 gmail.com
> > 49 googlemail.com
> > 46 gmx.de
> > 41 redhat.com
> > 33 yahoo.com
> > 23 suse.de
> > 22 gmx.net
> > 21 comcast.net
> >
> >
> > The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> > inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> > time to feed in... Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
> [...]
> How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certain number of streams to
> everything-except-gmail, so MTAs from the 21st century can get their mail
> faster, and set the rest on gmail-only. Slows down gmail and speeds up the
> rest?
Aargh ... what did us poor folk do to deserve this? I understand ~2000
of those Gmail users are only spectators, but most others don't have a
choice. In my case, my university doesn't allow mailboxes to go beyond
a certain limit and only a couple of weeks worth of lkml would eat
that up. And I suspect other free web mail servers that offer 3 GB of
space too would be equally slower. But I do hope someone from Google
listened to this -- half a second per recipient ... *sucks*.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists