lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070507201821.GG943@1wt.eu>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2007 22:18:21 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> In the  linux-kernel  -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
> 
>    2101 gmail.com
>      49 googlemail.com
>      46 gmx.de
>      41 redhat.com
>      33 yahoo.com
>      23 suse.de
>      22 gmx.net
>      21 comcast.net
> 
> 
> The  gmail  is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary 
> inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> time to feed in...  Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
> 
> So far we have tried to feed all recipients in one go per
> message - that is sending 2100  RCPT TO -lines in one swoop,
> and the system has taken some 15-25 minutes per message to
> feed it to gmail.  We are running the delivery 20 streams in
> parallel, so it isn't quite as bad as it sounds..
> 
> I do have one thing that gmail could enable to speed up the message
> delivery (a lot!) from VGER and other list delivery sources.
> That single magic needed thing is called "PIPELINING" support
> at gmail's inbound MX servers.  With suitably well behaving
> smtpserver it is really trivial to implement, all real difficult
> magic is at the sending side smtp client codes.

I suspect they behave like that on purpose to fight spam. If they
implemented pipelining, it wouldn't help them. Most probably they
can add whitelists to allow some known sources to reach them with
no slowdown. I hope someone at gmail will read and forward the
information so that gmail users can still be served when the load
increases. 12k mails in March and April are somewhat higher than
the usual 9-10k.

Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ