linux-kernel - Re: Back to the future.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070507203859.GB18400@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2007 22:38:59 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
	David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>,
	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Back to the future.

Hi!

> I don't dispute that it sometimes works today.
> 
> what I dispute is that makeing it work should be a contraint on a cleaner 
> design that happens to cause tcp connections to fail on suspend-to-disk 
> (hibernate).
> 
> if you are dong suspend-to-disk for such a short period that TCP 
> connections are able to recover (typically <15 min for most firewalls, in 
> some cases <2 min for connections with keep-alive) is it really
> worth it?

People were using swsusp to move server from one room to another.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/