linux-kernel - Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070508085950.GB8034@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 10:59:50 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> >> I'm using wli's 8k
> >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though.
> 
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > wlis are handy.
> 
> I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check
> in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them.
> 
> Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches?

I planned to merge them partially. Add the separate 4/8/irqstack options,
add the vmalloc support, but not support the > 8K stacks. Haven't yet.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/