| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:28:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: David Chinner <dgc@....com> cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1) On May 8 2007 16:18, David Chinner wrote: > >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:38:24PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote: >> > >> >> I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current >> >> kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins of work. >> > >> > Sounds like this is new behaviour? >> > I wonder why. Same compiler version? >> >> I've only recently started using xfs, so I couldn't say if its new >> behaviour. I did notice that it took a week or so for problems to set >> in; my theory is that as the filesystem got a bit aged, its >> datastructures got a bit more complex, and cause the kernel code to use >> more stack. But that's just a guess. FWIW, I run dm-crypt+xfs on one machine, of course with 8k since that's suse default. No issues. dm-crypt and lvm got something in common, don't they? Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists