[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705080812160.3974@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
cc: Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11
(PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> As I wanted to add multithreaded probing for some s390 busses, I
> discovered that the commit above removed the multithreaded probing
> infrastructure again, while just some days before some of my patches
> reworking it had been merged...
No.
I am *not* reverting that patch. The whole PCI bus-level multi-threaded
stuff was an incredibly broken idea.
If you have problems with probing, it's not going to be about the host
bus. It might be things like SCSI buses etc, and if somebody makes *those*
be more threaded, I'm ok with it. But I'm not going to accept another
broken PCI bus probe threading patch.
> (OK, PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE should not depend on BROKEN, but on
> EXPERIMENTAL with the reworked probing infrastructure. This got mixed
> up, I can send a patch that changes it.)
No. No. No.
Probing the core bus was broken. Not "experimental". Broken. It not only
threaded the wrogn area entirely, it also totally screwed up several
driver subsystems (like IDE).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists