lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705080812160.3974@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 08:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
cc:	Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11
 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)



On Tue, 8 May 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> As I wanted to add multithreaded probing for some s390 busses, I
> discovered that the commit above removed the multithreaded probing
> infrastructure again, while just some days before some of my patches
> reworking it had been merged...

No.

I am *not* reverting that patch. The whole PCI bus-level multi-threaded 
stuff was an incredibly broken idea.

If you have problems with probing, it's not going to be about the host 
bus. It might be things like SCSI buses etc, and if somebody makes *those* 
be more threaded, I'm ok with it. But I'm not going to accept another 
broken PCI bus probe threading patch.

> (OK, PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE should not depend on BROKEN, but on
> EXPERIMENTAL with the reworked probing infrastructure. This got mixed
> up, I can send a patch that changes it.)

No. No. No. 

Probing the core bus was broken. Not "experimental". Broken. It not only 
threaded the wrogn area entirely, it also totally screwed up several 
driver subsystems (like IDE).

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ